The Cost of Military Spending: We Paid $486 Million For This, They Sold It For 6 Cents a Pound

The Cost of Military Spending: We Paid $486 Million For This, They Sold It For 6 Cents a Pound

In our current financial situation, people are starting to re-evaluate military spending and how much priority it should actually have in our budget.

Make no mistake, we are not speaking of national defense. Rather, we are starting to rethink how much we spend internationally and how wisely our military spending is actually being done.

This comes down to two core issues: is our military spending actually increasing national defense and are we spending wisely? As to the former issue, it basically breaks down to whether our spending abroad is actually increasing our safety at home. Arguably, this has come up short – and repeatedly.

It’s a long-standing tradition for America to bolster its allies militarily. It makes sense. We have superior equipment and training which can give allied countries a strategic advantage when dealing with hostile neighbors. But more often than not, that access to equipment comes with a discount, or in some cases, we simply give away equipment.

One of these instances has been in Iraq, where we gave a lot of military equipment to the Iraqi army. The move may have been well intentioned, but I cite this instance because recently we’ve seen ISIS using American equipment in its fight in Syria – harvested from the Iraqi army that fled the path of ISIS. When American taxpayers build military hardware that ends up in the hands of the very terrorists it was designed to combat, we have a problem – a big problem.

Jump just a few months forward – in October, Business Insider ran a story on equipment we sent to the Afghan army – a fleet of G222 transport planes, part of a larger military aid package to the tune of $468 million dollars. What happened to them? Evidently, we didn’t provide regular maintenance parts for the planes so the Afghans sold them for scrap metal at six cents per pound.

The blunder in Afghanistan leads to the second issue: are we spending wisely? Whether this equipment falls in the wrong hands or not, it is clear that, even if it does not, it may be wasted money. In 1990, a law was passed that the Pentagon would be required to submit to external audits. Now, just 24 short years later (sarcasm intended), they are undergoing their first audit.

Perhaps taxpayers and Congress will get a real idea of where our tax money is going, to what purpose and whether it is effectual. This is something we’ve raised a flag on before and it is about time the Pentagon fell under proper review. If we are so worried about national security, perhaps exporting tanks and humvees shouldn’t be our priority. In 2012, Paul noted rather prophetically:

“Defense and war spending has grown 137% since 2001. That kind of growth is not sustainable”, adding, “Adm. Michael Mullen stated earlier this year that the biggest threat to our national security is our debt.” (CNN)

What are your thoughts on current military spending? Let us know on Twitter. Or join us on Facebook to keep track of all current issues.

Written by Mark Davis

(Photo courtesy of NATO Training Mission-Afghanistan, CC BY-SA 2.0)



Our Mission

Finally someone on Capital
Hill is willing to speak out and
stand firm for our personal
freedoms, our God-given
rights and all man's equality.

Here you can keep up with the
latest insights and events in
Paul World, helping our hero
restore the Constitution...
and take our country back!

Copyright © 2017 All Rights Reserved.
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Curation Policy


Join Us On Facebook Today! Discuss! Learn! Help Us Change Our Country! Click Here Now To Join In The Discussion!