The truth of the matter is that Paul is a different kind of Republican when it comes to foreign policy.
Take Paul’s history on Iran. In the spring of 2012, he worked to slow approval of a measure sanctioning Iran for their pursuit of a nuclear weapon, making clear that he didn’t want the vote to be seen as a first step toward a potential war.
While he eventually voted for those sanctions, he opposed an effort to put more sanctions on the country earlier this year, telling CNN’s Wolf Blitzer: ” I think the bottom line is we should give negotiations a chance. My hope is that sanctions will avoid war. We’ve been involved in two long wars in the Middle East. And I think it would be best if we can do anything possible to try to avoid another war now.” (Washington Post)
Rand Paul knows his approach to foreign policy is going to be at odds with the GOP standard.
As Chris Cillizza of The Washington Post notes:
Paul’s allies “have made clear he is savvier, politically speaking, than his father and understands that he isn’t likely to enjoy majority support within the party for his foreign policy views. Therefore, he won’t spend oodles of time talking about those issues.”
While Paul’s Op-Ed in The Washington Post had some folks scratching their heads, he wants to avoid stirring up the hornet’s nest and avoid war with a country that still chants “Death to America” whenever it gets the chance. Obviously, when dealing with Iran, “nuance” is more important than ever.
Jonathan Chait of the New York Magazine backs Paul up:
“It means we should take every non-military step to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons, but should those fail, deterrence is a more workable strategy than war. … It’s true that elected politicians tend not to say this, because why admit the potential failure of Plan A? What Paul is doing is merely saying out loud what many of them understand perfectly well.”
Rand Paul wants to keep all the options on the table. You can’t just say to a country like Iran that we’re going to “deal” with you the hard way ahead of time. Especially when Iranian President Hassan Rouhani is saying things like, “”We don’t attack any country and don’t want war but we will firmly confront any aggression against Iran.” “Strategic ambiguity” doesn’t sound like a strong foreign policy, but neither does showing all your cards to the other players.
(Photo courtesy of Chronos Tachyon, via Flickr CC)
WATCH: “All Options Should Be On The Table”
Finally someone on Capital
Hill is willing to speak out and
stand firm for our personal
freedoms, our God-given
rights and all man's equality.
Here you can keep up with the
latest insights and events in
Paul World, helping our hero
restore the Constitution...
and take our country back!